Why Banks Assess Your Home Loan at a Rate You're Not Actually Paying
Your home loan rate might be 6%. Yet the bank could assess your borrowing power as though the rate were around 9%.
That does not mean the bank thinks you are about to start paying 9%. It is a stress test — and it can make a very large difference to how much you are allowed to borrow.
The important bit is that not every lender uses exactly the same serviceability rules. Banks, non-banks and specialised refinance products can sometimes assess the same borrower very differently.
Check My Borrowing Position
Why does a bank test a 6% home loan at around 9%?
APRA requires regulated banks, credit unions and building societies to apply a minimum serviceability buffer of 3 percentage points when assessing new residential mortgage lending.
So, if the actual home loan rate is 6.00%, the lender will generally need to test the borrower at a rate of at least around 9.00%, subject to the lender's own assessment floor and policy.
APRA confirmed in May 2026 that the 3% buffer would remain in place.
The buffer is designed to leave room for things going wrong
A 30-year mortgage has to survive more than today's household budget.
Over the life of a loan, interest rates can change, household expenses can rise and income can fall.
The serviceability buffer is designed to create some breathing room for those risks.
From a borrower's perspective, the frustrating part is obvious: the higher assessment rate can materially reduce borrowing capacity even when the real repayment feels affordable.
The repayment you can afford is not necessarily the repayment the lender tests
This is why borrowers sometimes look at a repayment calculator and wonder why the bank will not lend them the amount they expected.
You might calculate that a particular loan costs $4,000 per month at the current rate.
The lender's serviceability model is effectively asking a different question:
That higher theoretical repayment is one of the reasons the bank's maximum borrowing figure can be lower than the amount a borrower feels comfortable paying today.
Not every lender uses the same serviceability buffer
This is where the Australian lending market gets more interesting.
APRA's 3% minimum applies to APRA-regulated authorised deposit-taking institutions — broadly, banks, credit unions and building societies.
Non-bank lenders are not automatically subject to that same ADI serviceability-buffer requirement.
Some non-bank lenders assess differently
Resimac is one example of a non-bank lender with published policy that uses the higher of its applicable floor rate or the actual interest rate plus 2.00%.
Using the same simple example:
A one percentage-point difference in the assessment rate can materially change borrowing capacity.
But it would be wrong to say all non-bank lenders use 2%.
Some refinance pathways can assess eligible borrowers more gently
There are also lender-specific refinance policies where eligible borrowers can be assessed using a 1% buffer.
These policies are generally designed for borrowers who are already demonstrating that they can repay an existing mortgage and are refinancing without materially increasing their debt.
Examples have included pathways requiring conditions such as:
- strong mortgage repayment conduct;
- no significant adverse change in income;
- no significant adverse change in expenses;
- acceptable LVR;
- dollar-for-dollar or limited-increase refinancing;
- appropriate loan term; and
- acceptable credit history.
That distinction matters enormously.
This is why one refinance can fail while another may work
Consider a borrower with an existing mortgage rate of 6.20%.
That does not mean every borrower who fails a standard bank assessment can simply move to a lower-buffer lender.
Income, expenses, LVR, credit conduct, property type and the rest of the lender's policy still matter.
Even the 3% bank rule has controlled exceptions
APRA has also acknowledged that regulated banks can approve limited exceptions to standard servicing policy where those exceptions are prudently managed.
In refinance situations, lenders may consider other evidence of repayment capacity, including a borrower's past repayment behaviour.
That does not mean a borrower can simply ask the bank to ignore the buffer.
The lender still needs appropriate controls, credit assessment and a defensible reason for approving the loan.
The lender is assessing your whole household position
The serviceability buffer gets most of the attention, but it is only one part of borrowing capacity.
Lenders also assess the household's income, living costs and existing commitments.
A $500 balance on a $20,000 card can still matter
Borrowers often focus on the amount owing on a credit card.
Lenders can instead assess the available credit limit because the borrower has access to that facility.
So a card with a $20,000 limit can affect borrowing capacity even if only $500 is currently outstanding.
That does not mean every borrower should cancel every card. It means genuinely unnecessary limits are worth reviewing before a lending application.
Your $700-a-week rent may not count as $700-a-week servicing income
Investment-property income is another area where lender policy can differ.
A lender may apply a percentage or other adjustment to rental income rather than counting every dollar.
That allows for things such as vacancies, management costs and other property expenses.
These are two different lending tests
Debt-to-income ratio, or DTI, is often confused with serviceability.
From February 2026, APRA requires regulated banks to keep lending at DTI of 6x or more within portfolio limits — 20% of new owner-occupier lending and 20% of new investor lending, measured separately.
A borrower can therefore pass a serviceability calculation and still face DTI constraints, or vice versa.
Lower home loan rates can improve borrowing power
Because the serviceability buffer is added to the actual interest rate, a lower product rate can also reduce the assessment rate.
The borrower's income may not have changed at all, yet borrowing capacity can improve because the stressed repayment falls.
The maximum a lender will approve is not automatically what you should borrow
This is probably the most important part of the whole serviceability conversation.
A bank, credit union or non-bank lender may calculate that you can borrow $850,000.
That number is the maximum produced by that lender's credit rules.
It does not know how much breathing room you personally want for holidays, family plans, savings, future children, career changes or simply sleeping comfortably at night.
We can look at the income, expenses, debts, credit limits, LVR and lender servicing rules behind the result — including whether another lender genuinely assesses your position differently.
Book a Borrowing Power ReviewThere is no single Australian home loan calculator
APRA's 3% serviceability buffer is a major part of home lending, but it is not the entire market.
Regulated banks generally operate under the 3% minimum. Some non-bank lenders use different approaches, including 2% buffers. Some specialised refinance policies can use a 1% buffer for tightly defined eligible borrowers.
At the same time, lenders can differ in how they treat income, expenses, rental income, credit cards and other debts.
The objective should not be to find whichever calculator produces the biggest number.
It should be to understand why the numbers differ, which lender policy genuinely fits the situation and whether the resulting loan remains comfortable.
Understand the number before you chase the maximum.
Loan Location can compare how suitable lenders assess your income, debts, expenses, LVR and serviceability — including bank and non-bank options where appropriate.
The aim is not to manufacture the biggest possible loan. It is to understand the real options and find a structure that makes sense for you.
Book a Broker